Q4 (c) graph

This commit is contained in:
David Lenfesty 2021-02-06 21:12:35 -07:00
parent 8641de7236
commit cf58a89590
2 changed files with 136 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
% commentstyle=\color{mygreen},%
% showstringspaces=false,%without this there will be a symbol in the places where there is a space
% numbers=left,%
% numberstyle={\tiny \color{black}},% size of the numbers
% numbersty_sumle={\tiny \color{black}},% size of th_sume numbers
% numbersep=9pt, % this defines how far the numbers are from the text
% emph=[1]{for,end,break},emphstyle=[1]\color{red}, %some words to emphasise
% %emph=[2]{word1,word2}, emphstyle=[2]{style},
@ -432,16 +432,151 @@ ylabel('Current [A]');
\section*{Question 3}
\subsection*{(a)}
Below is our code. Note that some variable names are different from those in the example code.
\subsection*{(b)}
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\begin{subfigure}{0.5\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{q3_ne.png}
\caption{Fermi Functions at $0.3V$.}
\label{fig:q3_ne}
\end{subfigure}%
\begin{subfigure}{0.5\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{q3_current.png}
\caption{Fermi Functions at $0.3V$.}
\label{fig:q3_current}
\end{subfigure}
\end{figure}
\subsection*{(c)}
\begin{figure}[H]
\centering
\begin{subfigure}{0.5\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{q3_0V05.png}
\caption{Fermi Functions at $0.3V$.}
\label{fig:q3_0V05}
\end{subfigure}%
\begin{subfigure}{0.5\linewidth}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{q3_0V.png}
\caption{Fermi Functions at $0.3V$.}
\label{fig:q3_0V}
\end{subfigure}
\end{figure}
\subsection*{(d)}
The difference in temperature causes a difference in the sharpness of the contact Fermi functions.
This in turn leads to the behaviour in $f_2 - f_1$ seen in Figures \ref{fig:q3_0V05} and \ref{fig:q3_0V}.
As seen in the previous questions, the current is proportional to the area under the curve of the $D(E) * [f_2 - f_1]$.
When the channel level is $\varepsilon = -0.05$ eV, the positive region of $[f_2 - f_1]$ overlaps the non-zero part of $D(E)$, giving a positive current.
Alternatively, when $\varepsilon = 0$ eV, half of the area under $D(E)$ overlaps with the negative part of $[f_2 - f_1]$, while half overlaps the positive part.
Thus the areas cancel out completely, and the resultant current is 0. A plot of $\varepsilon = +0.05$ eV would show overlap of $D(E)$ with the negative part of
$[f_2 - f_1]$, explaining why we get a reverse current flow at that channel level.
The maximum current occurs at $\varepsilon = \pm0.4$ eV (relative to $\mu$).
\section*{Question 4}
\subsection*{(a)}
\subsubsection*{(i)}
\begin{equation*}
I = 0, N = 0
\end{equation*}
This is because the only allowed energy level in the channel is at a higher energy
level than exists in either of the contacts, thus there are no electrons that would
flow into the channel from either contact, thus no current {\em and} no electrons in the channel.
\subsubsection*{(ii)}
\begin{equation*}
I = 608nA, N = 0.5
\end{equation*}
Given that we are operating with a single energy level in the channel, we can use
the equations 9 and 10 (provided in the assignment) directly.
\begin{equation*}
I = \frac{q}{\hbar} \cdot \frac{0.005eV \cdot 0.005eV}{0.005eV + 0.005eV}
\cdot [1 - 0] = 608nA
\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}
N = \frac{0.005eV \cdot 1 + 0.005eV \cdot 0}{0.005eV + 0.005eV} = 0.5
\end{equation*}
\subsubsection*{(iii)}
\begin{equation*}
I = 0A, N = 1
\end{equation*}
Given that we are operating with a single energy level in the channel, we can use
the equations 9 and 10 (provided in the assignment) directly.
\begin{equation*}
I = \frac{q}{\hbar} \cdot \frac{0.005eV \cdot 0.005eV}{0.005eV + 0.005eV}
\cdot [1 - 1] = 0A
\end{equation*}
\begin{equation*}
N = \frac{0.005eV \cdot 1 + 0.005eV \cdot 1}{0.005eV + 0.005eV} = 1
\end{equation*}
\subsection*{(b)}
\subsubsection*{(i)}
For $f_1(E + U)$ the step point occurs at $E = \mu_1 - U = 0.25$ eV. Since $U = -0.25$ eV, it follows that
$\mu_1 = 0$ eV. Since $\mu_1 = \mu - qV_S$ and $\mu = 0$ eV, $V_S = 0$ V.
For $f_2(E + U)$ the step point occurs at $E = \mu_2 - U = -0.25$ eV. Since $U = -0.25$ eV, it follows that
$\mu_2 = -0.5$ eV. Since $\mu_1 = \mu - qV_D$ and $\mu = 0$ eV, $V_D = 0.5$ V.
\subsubsection*{(ii)}
For $f_1(E)$ the step point occurs at $E = \mu_1 = 0.25$ eV. Since $\mu_1 = \mu - qV_S$ and $\mu = 0$ eV, $V_S = -0.25$ V.
For $f_2(E + U)$ the step point occurs at $E = \mu_2 = -0.25$ eV. Since $\mu_1 = \mu - qV_D$ and $\mu = 0$ eV, $V_D = 0.25$ V.
This assumes $U = 0$ eV.
\subsection*{(c)}
\subsubsection*{(i)}
\begin{figure}
\centering
\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{q4c.jpg}
\caption{}
\label{fig:q4c}
\end{figure}
\subsubsection*{(ii)}
\subsubsection*{(iii)}
\subsection*{(d)}
Using equation (5) in the assignment and plugging in the given values we obtain:
\begin{equation*}
U = -q[\frac{C_SV_S+C_GV_G+C_DV_D}{C_E}] + \frac{q^2(N-N_0)}{C_E}
U = \alpha_SV_S + \alpha_GV_G + \alpha_DV_D + U_0(N - N_0)\:\:[eV]
U = 0*0 + 0.5*0\:eV + 0.5*0.6\:eV + 0.25\:eV*(0.325 - 0)\:\:[eV]
U = 0.38125 eV$ $
\end{equation*}
Then, starting with Equation \ref{eq:N_old} and plugging in $D(E-U) = \delta(E - U - \varepsilon)$, we obtain
\subsection*{(e)}
\subsection*{(f)}
\subsection*{(g)}

BIN
PS1/q4c.jpg Normal file

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 512 KiB